THEORIES OF WAR AND PEACE
LECTURER: Dr Olufemi
Patrick ADELUSI
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
The course focuses on the main theories
of War; the consequences of war and the theories of peace.
The Imperatives of search for Peace and
the enduring notion of stability in Domestic and International System.
COURSE OBJECTIVES:
At the end of this course, students are
expected to;
1.
Have
knowledge of Definition and Classification of War.
2.
Identify
and discuss existing relevant theories of Conflict and
War: A Process Perspective.
3.
And
Understand what are Realist Theories Of War, The Classical
Balance of Power, Alliances and War, Economic Theories Of War, Theories of the
Democratic Peace, The “Clash of Civilizations” (Huntington),
METHOD OF TEACHING/TEACHING AID
The
method of Teaching is mostly participatory. The teacher outlines the major
points of discourse on the topic. He talks to these points so outlined. Students are encouraged to participate by
raising questions. The Teaching Aid employed is the Overhead Projector where
transparency containing the printer matter for the course is projected on the
screen during the contact hours.
MODULE I: COURSE INTRODUCTION
Week 1: Definition and Classification of War
Week 2:
Classical Realist Theories
Week 3:
Human Nature and Instinct Theories.
MODULE II: BALANCE OF POWER THEORY
Week 4: The Classical Balance of Power
Week 5: Game-Theoretic Models of the Balance of Power
Week 6: Alliances and War.
MODULE III: INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, COLLECTIVE SECURITY,
AND
PEACE
Week 7: Theories of
Regimes, Institutions, and Norms.
Week 8: Theories of Collective Security and Security Regimes.
Week 9: The Structure of Peace.
MODULE IV: ECONOMIC THEORIES OF WAR
Week 10: Classical Liberal Theories of War.
Week 11: Interdependence and War: Realist and Liberal Theories.
MODULE V: SOCIETAL-LEVEL THEORIES: THE DEMOCRATIC PEACE DEBATE
Week 12: Theories of the Democratic Peace.
(a) Democratization and War.
(b) Why Democracies Win Wars.
(c) The “Clash of Civilizations” (Huntington)
Week 13: Revision
METHOD OF GRADING:
C/A Test: 10%
Mid-Semester Exam 20%
End of Semester Exam 70%
GRAND RULES & REGULATIONS
Attendance to lectures and tutorials
are compulsory for registered students.
Students must be seated 10 minutes
before the commencement of every lecture.
Listening to Teacher as He talks to Bullet
Points on the Screen.
The class copies Bullet Points on the
screen.
Students are encouraged to ask
questions and make observation
There will be two hours of Lectures and
an hour of tutorials every week.
ALIGNMENT WITH
COVENANT UNIVERSITY VISION/GOALS
The course aligns with core values of
Capacity Building.
CONTEMPORARY ISSUES RELEVANCE
War against Terrorism in Afgahnistan
TOPICS FOR TERM PAPER/ASSIGNMENT
1.
Realist Theories Of War
2.
Alliances And War
3.
Power Transition Theory
4.
Territory And War
5.
Theories Of Economic Interdependence And
Peace
6.
The Democratic Peace Debate
7.
Democratization And War
8.
The Diversionary Theory Of War
9.
Strategic Culture And War
10.
Learning And War
REFERENCE
TEXTS
1.
Michael W. Doyle, Ways of War and Peace. New York: W.W. Norton, 1997. Introduction.
2.
Jack S. Levy, "War and Peace." In
Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons,eds., Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage, 2002. Pp. 350-352 only.
3.
Jack S. Levy, "The Causes of War and the
Conditions of Peace." Annual
Review of Political Science, 1 (1998):
139-66.
4.
Stephen M. Walt, "The Renaissance of
Security Studies." International
Studies Quarterly 35,2 (June 1991): 211-39.
5.
Edward A. Kolodziej, "Renaissance in
Security Studies? Caveat Lector!" International
Studies Quarterly 36,4 (December 1992): 421-38.
6.
Richard K. Betts, "Should Strategic
Studies Survive?" World
Politics 50,1 (October 1997): 7-33.
7.
Steven E. Miller, "International Security at Twenty-five: From One World to Another." International Security, 26, 1 (Summer 2001), 5-39.
8.
David A. Baldwin, "Security Studies and
the End of the Cold War." World
Politics 48,1 (October 1995): 117-41.
9.
David A. Baldwin, "The Concept of
Security." Review of International
Studies, 23 (1997): 5-26.
10.
Keith Krause and Michael C. Williams,
"Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods." Mershon International Studies Review, 40,2 (October 1996): 229-54.
11.
Roland Paris, "Human Security: Paradigm
Shift or Hot Air?" International
Security, 26, 2 (Fall 2001), 87-102.
12.
Tusicisny, Andrej (2004). "Civilizational Conflicts: More Frequent, Longer, and
Bloodier?" (PDF). Journal of Peace Research 41 (4): 485–498.
Retrieved on 2007-10-03
2b. Definition and Classification of War
1.
John A. Vasquez, The War Puzzle. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Intro and chap. 1-2.
2.
Quincy Wright, A Study of War, 2nd ed., rev. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965.Pp. 8-13.
3.
Bronislaw Malinowski, "An
Anthropological Analysis of War." American
Journal of Sociology 46 (1941): 521-50. Reprinted in Leon Bramson
and George W. Goethals, eds.,War. New York: Basic Books, 1968. Pp. 245-68.
4.
Julian Lider, On the Nature of War. Westmead, England: Saxon House, 1977. Chap. 2 and pp.269-72.
5.
J. David Singer and Melvin Small, The Wages of War, 1816-1965. New York: Wiley, 1965. Chap. 1-2.
6.
Jack S. Levy, War in the Modern Great Power System, 1495-1975. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1983. Chap. 3-4 (especially pp.
50-53).
7.
John F. Guilmartin, Jr., "Ideology and
Conflict: The Wars of the Ottoman Empire, 1453-1606." Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18 (Spring 1988): 721-47.
8.
Kalevi J. Holsti, The State, War, and the State of War. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Chap. 1-2.
9.
Francis A. Beer, Meanings of War and Peace. College Station: Texas A & M University Press, 2001.
2c. The Clausewitzian Paradigm
1.
Peter Paret, "Clausewitz." In Peter
Paret, Makers of Modern Strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976. Pp. 186-213.
2.
Clausewitz, On War, ed. and
trans. by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 1976. Book I, chap. 1-2; Book VIII, chap. 6. See also essays by Peter
Paret, Michael Howard, and Bernard Brodie.
3.
Michael Howard, Clausewitz. Oxford:
Oxford Univ. Press, 1983.
4.
Raymond Aron, Clausewitz, trans. by
Christine Booker and Norman Stone. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1986.
5.
Peter Paret, Clausewitz and the State. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.
6.
Michael I. Handel, Clausewitz and Modern Strategy. London: Cass, 1986.
7.
Martin Van Creveld, The Transformation of War. New York: Free Press, 1991.
2d. Contemporary Perspectives of the Coercive Use
of Force
1.
Thomas Schelling, Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966. Chap. 1.
2.
Robert J. Art, "To What Ends Military
Power?" International Security 4 (Spring 1980): 3-35.
2e. Conceptions of Causation
3.
Thomas D. Cook and Donald T. Campbell,
"Causal Inference and the Language of Experimentation." In Cook and
Campbell, Quasi-Experimentation. New York: Rand McNally, 1979. Chap. 1.
4.
Gary King, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney
Verba. Designing Social Inquiry:
Scientific Inquiry in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. Chap. 3.
5.
Michael Nicholson, Causes and Consequences in International Relations:
A Conceptual Study. London, Pinter, 1996.
6.
Hidemi Suganami, On the Causes of War. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. Chap 4.
7.
John Gerring, Social Science Methodology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
8.
Gary Goertz and Harvey Starr, eds., Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications." Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.
2f. Parsing the Question "What Causes
War?"
Greg Cashman, What Causes War? New York: Macmillan, 1993. Chap. 2.
2g. Human Nature and Instinct Theories
1.
Konrad Lorenz, On Aggression. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1963.
2.
Robert Ardrey, The Territorial Imperative. New York: Dell, 1966.
3.
Kenneth Waltz, Man, the State and War. New York:Columbia University Press, 1959. Chap.2
4.
Stephen D. Nelson, "Nature/Nurture
Revisited I: A Review of the Biological Bases of Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution 18 (June 1974): 285-335.
5.
Samuel Kim, "The Lorenzian Theory of
Aggression and Peace Research: A Critique." In Richard Falk and Samuel
Kim, eds., The War System. Boulder: Westview, 1980. Chap. 4.
6.
R. Paul Shaw and Yuwa Wong, Genetic Seeds of Warfare: Evolution, Nationalism,
and Patriotism. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
7.
Albert Somit, "Humans, Chimps, and
Bonobos: The Biological Bases of Aggression, War, and Peacemaking." Journal of Conflict Resolution 34 (September 1990): 553-82.
8.
Leonard Berkowitz, "Biological Roots:
Are Humans Inherently Violent?" In Betty Glad, ed., Psychological Dimensions of War. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1990. Pp. 24-40.
9.
Robert A. Hinde, "Aggression and War:
Individuals, Groups, and States." In Tetlock, et. al., Behavior, Society, and International Conflict, vol. III. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. Chap. 1.
10.
Richard Wrangham and Dale Peterson, Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin/Mariner Books, 1996.
11.
Stuart A. Bremer, "Advancing the
Scientific Study of War." In Stuart A. Bremer and Thomas R. Cusack, eds., The Process of War: Advancing the Scientific Study
of War. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach, 1995. Chap.
1.
12.
Tusicisny, Andrej (2004). "Civilizational Conflicts: More Frequent, Longer, and
Bloodier?" (PDF). Journal of Peace Research 41 (4): 485–498.
Retrieved on 2007-10-03
No comments:
Post a Comment